Today's topic is one many companies face, but rarely talk about, inside a risk.
It's a growing problem and it should be on your radar.
Imagine this.
A senior sales manager at a mid-sized company puts in her notice after seven years.
She's trusted.
She has access to everything, the customer database, pricing sheets, next quarters, strategic plan.
On her last day, she forwards a few emails to her personal account and copies a spreadsheet to a USB drive.
Nothing triggers an alarm? Why would it?
She's authorized. She's supposed to have access.
That's the problem in a nutshell.
Most companies spend heavily on perimeter security.
Firewalls, antivirus, multi-factor authentication, they build walls around the castle.
Most companies focus on the walls.
They forget about the people inside, but here's the thing.
Once you're inside those walls, you're assumed to be safe and trustworthy.
And that assumption creates a huge blind spot.
Insider threats are hard to detect because they come from authorized users.
They're not breaking in. They're logging in.
And logging in looks exactly like normal work.
Traditional security tools keep bad actors out, but they're not designed to spot a trusted employee
who suddenly starts acting differently.
That's where the real risk lives.
By the end of this episode, you'll understand what Microsoft Perview Insider Risk Management
actually is and why companies turn to it to solve this exact problem.
But first, let's look at why traditional security fails here.
Why traditional security misses insider threats?
Traditional security guards the front door.
That's its job. Firewalls block unauthorized traffic, antivirus catches known malware, MFA checks credentials.
These tools are essential, but they share one dangerous assumption
that anyone past the front door can be trusted.
But here's the thing about insider risk.
It's not a single type of behavior.
It comes in two distinct flavors. First, intentional risk, theft, sabotage, data exfiltration.
The employee who takes client lists to a competitor, the disgruntled worker who deletes critical files.
That's the malicious kind.
Then there's accidental risk.
The employee who clicks a fishing link and exposes credentials,
the manager who sends a spreadsheet to the wrong person,
the contractor who stores sensitive files on a personal device.
Both types are common.
In fact, most breaches involve some insider action, either malicious or careless.
The 2024 Verizon report found that over 30% of breaches involved internal actors.
And that's just the reported ones.
Traditional security tools aren't built to catch this.
They look for external threats, not internal behavior.
Your firewall doesn't care if someone copies a customer list to a USB drive.
Your antivirus doesn't flag emails forwarded to Gmail.
To the system, it's all just normal activity.
So you have a gap.
You need to monitor risky behavior without violating privacy.
You can't read every email or watch every download.
That's not practical or legal.
So how do you find the signal in all the noise without becoming big brother?
That's where Microsoft Perview comes in.
What is Microsoft Perview inside a risk management?
Today's topic is one that almost everyone has heard of,
but few people actually understand.
So let's set the record straight.
Microsoft Perview inside a risk management isn't some new tool you go and install.
It's a module inside Microsoft Perview,
which is Microsoft's compliance platform.
If your company already pays for Microsoft 365,
you probably already have access to it.
You just haven't turned it on yet.
Here's the simplest definition.
Inside a risk management finds potentially risky user activity,
investigates what happened and helps you act on it.
It looks for patterns that suggest a possible insider threat,
whether that threat is accidental or intentional.
Let's clear up a common myth right now.
This is not spying.
Microsoft built privacy guard rails straight into the system
and will cover those later.
The core idea is a risk management framework,
not a surveillance tool.
Your goal is protecting the company and its data,
not catching someone making a mistake.
So how does it actually work?
The system pulls signals from across Microsoft 365.
Exchange online watches email activity, SharePoint tracks file access,
Teams monitors communication patterns,
Entra ID checks, login behavior and device compliance.
The system takes all those data points and searches for patterns.
Think of it as a risk scoring engine.
The system doesn't flag a single action.
It flags patterns over time.
One large download might be completely innocent.
Maybe you're pulling files for a big presentation,
but multiple large downloads are two in the morning
from someone who's already put in their notice
and is forwarding emails to a personal account.
That's a pattern worth a closer look.
The system learns what normal looks like for your organization
and for each role.
A developer downloading code is normal.
An HR manager downloading the entire employee database is not.
How Microsoft defines and scores risk.
So how does the system actually decide what's risky?
It's not magic.
Nobody sits in a dark room watching your screen.
The system uses machine learning models
that learn the difference between typical behavior
and unusual behavior.
The system tracks a wide range of indicators.
File downloads, email forwarding,
printing sensitive documents,
accessing restricted sites,
copying data to USB drives.
Each one is a single data point,
a signal that something happened.
But a signal alone doesn't tell you much.
What matters is the pattern.
Each indicator carries a weight
and the system watches for cumulative patterns over time.
Think of a smoke detector.
One whisp of steam from a hot shower doesn't set it off.
The stain smoke from a real fire does.
The system watches for sustained patterns
that match known risky behaviors.
One action alone rarely triggers an alert.
A single large file download might be innocent,
but combine that with email forwarding to a personal account
after hours access and a recent linked in job update.
Now you have something worth investigating.
The system assigns a risk score based on how many indicators are present
and how they combine together.
Here's the clever part.
The models learn from your organization's own baseline.
A developer accessing code repositories all day is totally normal.
An accountant doing the same thing is unusual.
A sales rep downloading customer data every Friday
is just doing their job.
A facilities manager doing that is a red flag.
The system adapts to each role,
so it doesn't drown you in false alarms.
Now let's clear up the difference between risk signals and actual events.
A risk signal says something might be wrong.
It's a probability not a certainty.
The system flags unusual patterns for human review.
The final decision always rests with a person.
Indicators, policies and templates.
Let's get practical.
Microsoft gives you ready-made policy templates
for the most common insider risk scenarios.
You don't have to build everything from scratch.
Just pick a template that matches the situation you're trying to catch.
There are templates for data theft by departing employees
for accidental sharing of sensitive information
for security policy violations
and for data leaks through unauthorized software.
Each template already includes the right signals
and warning levels for that specific scenarios.
So how do you set one up?
You pick a template, then you select which users to monitor
by group, by department, or across the entire organization.
You set the thresholds for what triggers an alert
and then the system starts watching.
The indicators themselves are the raw signals.
Over 50 built-in types cover file downloads from SharePoint,
email attachments sent outside the organization,
printing, accessing restricted sites,
forwarding emails to personal domains
and copying data to cloud storage services.
Microsoft adds new ones regularly,
but here's where the real power comes in.
You can bring in external signals too.
Connect your HR system to feed in data
about upcoming departures, performance reviews,
or policy violations.
Connect physical security systems for batch and data.
Even connect legal systems for investigations already in progress.
These external connectors give the risk scoring context
that Microsoft 365 wouldn't have on its own.
Now here's a critical point.
Policies do not run automatically.
They require setup and tuning.
You don't just flip a switch and get full inside a risk protection.
You have to configure the templates, select the users,
set the thresholds, and then monitor the results.
This is not a set it and forget it system.
Think of it like setting up security cameras in specific hallways.
Not everywhere at once.
You decide which areas are high risk.
You point the cameras there.
You adjust the sensitivity.
Then you watch the footage to see if you're catching the right things.
Over time you refine the setup based on what you learned.
So you have an alert.
Now what?
That's where investigation begins.
Investigating an insider risk.
An alert comes in.
What does that actually look like?
You open the Perview Compliance Portal
and navigate to insider risk management.
There it is.
An alert with the risk score, a username,
and a summary of the activity that triggered it.
Click into the alert and you see something very useful.
A timeline.
This isn't just a list of events.
It's a chronological view of the user's activity tied to the risk pattern.
You can see what happened when it happened and in what order.
Did the file downloads come before or after the email forwarding?
Was there a pattern of after hours access
that escalated over several days?
The timeline makes the sequence clear.
Here's a smart design choice.
Microsoft got right.
You can view the evidence without revealing everything to the user.
The investigator sees the activity,
but the system doesn't expose the content of emails
or documents unless you explicitly choose to reveal it.
This is privacy by design.
You can assess the risk pattern
without reading someone's private correspondence.
If you need to see the actual content to confirm a suspicion,
you can escalate to a deeper investigation.
But the default view protects the user's privacy.
Once you've reviewed the evidence, you have three options.
You can mark the alert as confirmed.
Yes, this is actually risky behavior.
You can mark it as benign, false alarm, normal activity,
or you can escalate it to a formal case.
A case is a more structured investigation
that can include notes, additional evidence from tools like eDiscovery
and a formal workflow for resolution.
The goal isn't to punish.
It's to decide what action is needed.
Maybe the employee needs training on data handling policies.
Maybe a warning is enough,
or maybe the situation, warrants, termination or legal action.
The system gives you the information you need to make that decision,
but it doesn't make the decision for you.
All of this sounds powerful, but what about privacy?
Microsoft thought of that privacy guardrails and compliance.
So let's tackle the question that always comes up
when I talk about insider risk monitoring.
Isn't this just surveillance?
Doesn't Microsoft want to watch your every move
and report back to your boss?
The short answer is no, and here's why.
Inside a risk management was built with privacy baked in from the start.
Privacy isn't slapped on as an afterthought.
It's how the whole system is designed.
Here's the most visible example.
During an investigation, you can anonymize user names.
Instead of seeing Sarah Johnson as you see user A,
you can study the pattern, look at the timeline
and check the risk score without ever knowing who the person is
only when you're ready to act to reveal the identity.
That prevents bias and protects privacy during the initial review.
Every move an investigator makes gets logged to,
including who viewed an alert, who revealed an identity,
and who escalated a case.
That's all recorded.
If someone abuses the system, there's a trail.
That's accountability at every level.
The policies themselves need explicit admin approval before they activate,
so nobody can accidentally flip on insider risk monitoring for the whole company.
Alerts also come with a limited shelf life
and don't sit in the system forever.
After a set period, they get purged automatically
unless you've escalated them into a case.
That addresses the biggest fear of this becoming a permanent surveillance tool.
It doesn't work that way.
Think of it as a risk management framework
with clear boundaries and built-in controls.
Microsoft even provides a data privacy impact assessment template
to help you document your compliance with local laws.
If you're in Europe, that covers GDPR.
If you're in California, that covers CCPA.
The template walks through the privacy implications
so you can decide what makes sense for your organization.
So is this only for big corporations?
Let's look at some real examples.
Real-world scenarios and when to use it.
Time to make this concrete.
Here are three situations where insider risk management actually makes a difference.
First, imagine an employee gives two weeks notice
because they're moving to a competitor.
In their final days, they start pulling up files they haven't touched in months
like customer contracts, pricing models, and strategic plans.
And they forward a few emails to their personal Gmail.
Nothing dramatic happens on any single day,
but the patent tells the story of a departing employee
suddenly grabbing historical data
and sending it outside the company.
The system flags it and investigators reviews the timeline,
sees the escalation over several days
and can step in before that employee walks out the door
with sensitive information.
Second, someone in accounting accidentally shares a spreadsheet
containing customer payment details, bank account numbers, and contact information.
They meant to send it to a colleague
but typed the wrong email address.
The system detects sensitive data,
heading to an external recipient
who has never received this kind of information before
and an alert fires.
The investigator sees the pattern of first-time external sharing of classified data.
They can notify the user, recall the email if possible,
and offer training on how to handle data properly.
Third, an employee installs an unauthorized cloud storage app
on their work laptop.
The app starts syncing files from their documents folder
to a personal dropbox account
and the system detects the unapproved software installation
and the unusual outbound data transfer.
It flags this as a security policy violation.
The investigator reviews the activity
and decides whether it was a mistake
or a deliberate attempt to take data out of the organization.
The response could be a warning
or it could escalate to a full forensic investigation.
Each of these scenarios triggers a different policy template
and a different response workflow.
Data theft by departing employees runs on one template.
Accidental oversharing uses another,
security policy violations, user third,
the system adapts to what is actually happening.
Now, is this only for giant enterprises
with thousands of employees?
No.
Any company with more than a few hundred employees
should start thinking about insider risk.
Smaller companies can use simpler tools
like compliance manager for basic data governance.
But if you have sensitive data,
people leaving the company
and then need to understand what's going on inside your organization,
inside a risk management is worth a serious look.
So how do you start using this today?
Implementation challenge.
You don't need to roll this out
across the whole company on day one
and actually you shouldn't start small.
Begin with your compliance team.
Look at the templates, Microsoft provides,
read the descriptions
and figure out which ones fit your biggest risks.
Do you have a lot of people leaving the company?
Do you deal with accidental data leaks often?
Pick one or two templates
that match your most urgent problems?
From there, try it with a pilot group,
pick a small department like finance or HR
or even a single team that's excited to test it.
You don't need to monitor everyone to learn
how the system works.
After that spend about 30 days tuning the thresholds,
expect false positives at first
because the system doesn't know your organization yet.
It might flag something that looks weird
but is perfectly normal for your team.
That's okay, mark those alerts as benign.
Over time, the system learns
and the false positives drop
and don't forget to train your investigators.
They need to understand the review workflow
and the privacy controls.
Show them how to hide user names
and how to escalate a case.
Make sure they know the difference between a risk signal
and a confirmed threat.
Most companies start seeing useful alerts within two weeks
once the system is set upright.
But remember, this is a journey not a one-time install.
You'll keep improving the policies,
adding new indicators and adjusting thresholds
as your organization changes.
So here's the bottom line.
Inside a risk is a real blind spot in most companies.
Traditional security locks the front door
but trusts everyone inside.
Microsoft Pervue Inside a Risk Management
gives you a clear way to close that gap.
It spots patterns, helps you investigate
and guides you to the right action.
This isn't about distrusting your employees.
It's about protecting the company
and the data everyone depends on.
The key takeaway is simple.
Starts more, tune often, and always respect privacy.
The system is built to work with those boundaries,
not against them.
If this episode helped you understand
inside a risk management a little better,
hit subscribe, leave a comment
about how your company handles inside a risk.
I read every single one
and share this with someone in compliance
or IT who needs to understand this topic.
They'll thank you.
I'm Mirko Peters from M365.
of FM, see you in the next KnowledgeNugget.