If you've ever had a file server crash on a Friday afternoon, you know the panic, the
frantic calls, the "is the backup working?"
Question nobody wants to answer, and the drive to the office just to poke at a blinking
box.
I'm Mirko Peters and today we're looking at a better way, as your files.
Here's the thing about traditional file servers.
They're physical, which means they need maintenance, security patches, backup management
and someone to swap a hard drive when it fails.
For small teams, that's a huge burden.
You're not running a data center, you're trying to get work done.
By the end of this episode, you'll understand what Azure files really is, why the new file
shares resource makes setup much simpler, and when it's the right choice for your team.
Grab your coffee and let's dive in.
What is Azure files?
So what exactly is Azure files?
Here's the simplest definition.
Azure files is a cloud-based file share you can mount like a network drive with no server
to manage, no hardware, no operating system updates, no backup schedules to lose sleep
over.
With the traditional file server, you're the admin, with Azure files Microsoft is the admin.
Think of it as a filing cabinet that lives in Microsoft's data center instead of under your
desk.
You still open the drawer and grab a file, but the cabinet itself, the locks, the fireproofing,
the maintenance, that's all handled for you.
The difference is, you never have to worry about the cabinet breaking down as your files
works with Windows, Linux and Mac.
Any device that supports SMB, that's the standard Windows file sharing language or NFS,
the standard for Linux can connect.
You access it over the internet or through a private network if you want to keep traffic
off the public web.
And it's fully managed.
Microsoft handles the hardware, software updates, backups and higher availability.
If a disk fails in their data center, they swap it without you ever seeing it.
Most users never notice it's there, but it's a core service.
No more late night emergency trips to the office.
Now to understand why you'd want this, let's look at the old way first.
The pain of traditional file servers.
So imagine you run a small business with 15 employees.
Somewhere in the office closet, there's a physical server.
Maybe it's an old desktop you repurposed, or maybe it's an actual server that costs a
few thousand dollars a few years ago.
Either way, it's running Windows server and serving up file shares for everyone in the
company.
Here's the thing, hard drives fail, they always do.
And when that drive dies, the file share goes down.
Maybe you have a backup, maybe you don't.
Maybe the backup has been failing silently for six months.
That's a conversation nobody wants to have.
Then there's the space issue, file servers fill up fast.
Someone drops 15 gigs of vacation photos in the shared drive.
Another department holds old project files from three years ago.
You add storage, you either buy more hardware or spend hours reconfiguring what you have.
Neither option is fun and patching.
Windows server needs regular security updates, which means downtime.
Someone has to log in on a weekend, apply the updates, cross their fingers, and hope
the server comes back up.
If it doesn't, you're spending Sunday afternoon troubleshooting.
Ransomware is another worry.
One click on the wrong email attachment and your file server gets encrypted.
Every file is locked.
The recovery process is painful and it assumes your backups are actually working.
If your office has multiple locations, things get worse.
Sharing files between branches means setting up VPNs or slow replication.
The remote office gets a fraction of the speed the main office has.
People complain, you spend time tuning connections.
Here's a real example.
A small construction company I know had 15 employees and an aging server sitting in the
corner of the break room.
Every time someone said the file server is slow, the owner felt that not in his stomach.
Was it dying?
Was it time to spend another $5,000 on hardware?
Should he hire an IT guy just to manage one box?
It's stressed that constant, low grade worry about a single piece of hardware is exactly
what Azure Files removes.
It's not just about the features, it's about not having to think about it at all.
Azure Files takes all that overhead away.
Let's look at how it actually works.
How Azure Files works, SMB, NFS, and mounting.
Azure Files uses standard protocols.
What does that mean in plain English?
It means you don't need special software or custom tools to connect.
If your computer can talk to a network drive, it can talk to Azure Files.
The Windows machines that's SMB serve a message block.
It's the same protocol your current file server uses.
For Linux systems, its NFS network file system both are industry standards that have been
around for decades.
Azure Files speaks both languages fluently.
So how do you actually use it?
You mount it on Windows, you map it as a drive letter, Z or S or whatever letter you want.
On Linux, you mount it to a folder path.
Either way, it looks and feels like local storage.
Open file explorer, there it is.
You can drop files just like you would to a folder on your own hard drive.
Here's the part that surprises people.
Data travels encrypted by default when you use SMB 3.0 or higher, which modern Windows
and Mac OS system support.
The connection between your computer and Azure Files is encrypted in transit.
Nobody on the network can sniff your files as they move.
That's a big deal for security and it's on by default.
You can mount Azure Files shares from practically anywhere.
From a virtual machine running in Azure obviously.
From an on-premises server connected through VPN or ExpressRoute, even from your laptop
over the internet if you set it up correctly.
The file share lives in the cloud but it feels local.
Let me give you a concrete example.
Say your accounting team needs access to the same set of spreadsheets.
In the old world, you'd set up a file server, configure permissions and hope the network
doesn't go down.
With Azure Files, you create a single file share, map it as drive Z.
On each accounting machine and they're done.
They never know it's in the cloud, they just see a drive letter that works.
Authentication is handled through identity.
Instead of managing storage account keys, those long strings that look like passwords
on steroids, you use Azure Active Directory or your on-premises Active Directory.
Users log in with their normal credentials.
The same username and password they use for email.
No extra keys to store, no shared secrets to rotate.
Now the way Azure Files was originally set up had a twist.
That's where the new change comes in.
The old way.
Storage accounts.
Here's where things get a little technical.
But trust me, it's worth sticking with me.
So originally, file shares weren't their own thing in Azure.
They lived inside something called a storage account.
Imagine a storage account as a big container.
Inside that container, you could put blobs for unstructured data,
queues for messages, tables for structured data.
And yes, you could also create file shares.
But here's the problem, that storage account had limits.
IOPs limits, throughput limits, capacity limits.
And every file share inside that container had to share those limits.
So if you had five file shares in one storage account, they were all fighting for the same pool
of performance.
One busy share could slow down all the others.
Network settings worked the same way.
Firewall rules, private endpoints, those applied to the whole storage account.
You couldn't say this file share is only accessible from the finance department's network,
and that file share is open to everyone.
The network rules were all on nothing.
Then there were the storage account keys.
Every storage account had two access keys, and those keys gave full access to everything
inside, every blob, every queue, every table, every file share.
If you only needed access to one file share too bad, the key opened everything.
Billing was another headache.
All the costs showed up at the storage account level.
So if you wanted to charge back to different departments, you had to do manual calculations.
Well, the marketing teams share used about 30% of the storage, so they owe 30% of the bill.
That gets old fast.
Here's an analogy.
Imagine you're renting a warehouse.
Inside that warehouse you've got several rooms.
But the warehouse has a single entrance, a single security guard, and a single electricity
meter.
Every room shares the same power, the same access rules, and the same bill.
If one room cranks up the AC, all the other rooms get warmer.
If you want to secure one room separately, you can't.
Because there's only one door.
That's what the old storage account model felt like.
One big container with shared limits, shared security, and shared billing.
It worked, but it wasn't elegant, especially when all you wanted was a simple file share.
But Microsoft heard the feedback and built something better.
The new file shares resource.
So here's what changed.
Microsoft created a brand new top level resource.
You now create a file share directly with no storage account parent.
It's its own thing.
Think of it like managed disks.
Remember how it used to work with virtual machines?
You had to create a storage account, then create a page blob inside it, then attach that
blob to your VM.
It was a whole process.
Then Microsoft introduced managed disks.
You just create a disk.
Done.
No storage account.
No page blob.
No messing around.
The new file shares resource works the same way.
Behind the scenes, there's a new resource provider called Microsoft file shares.
It's independent and standalone.
When you create a file share now, you're not creating a child of something else.
You're creating the resource itself.
So what does that actually buy you?
Let me walk through the benefits.
First each share has its own limits, IOPS, throughput, capacity.
They're all per share now.
No more sharing a pool with other file shares.
One busy share can't slow down another.
If your engineering team is hammering their share with build artifacts, the HR department
share keeps humming along.
Second, network configuration is per share.
Private endpoints, firewall rules, you set them on the individual file share.
Want one share accessible only from the finance department's virtual network and another
open to the whole company?
No problem.
They're independent.
Third, there's no storage account key.
Remember that all powerful key that gave access to everything gone.
Authentication is identity based or through network rules.
Users log in with their normal credentials.
No shared secrets to manage.
No keys to rotate.
No risk of a leaked key exposing all your file shares.
Fourth, building is per share.
In Azure cost management, you see exactly what each file share costs.
If you need to charge back to departments, it's right there.
No manual calculations, no spreadsheets, no guesswork.
Fifth, the control plane has its own quotas.
The control plane is the layer that handles operations like creating shares, modifying them,
deleting them, taking snapshots.
In the old model, lots of administrators working on lots of file shares inside one storage
account could hit management limits.
Now each share has its own bucket for those operations.
It's much harder to hit a limit.
Now there's a catch.
At general availability, this new resource is currently limited to the SSD tier and the
NFS protocol.
That's a specific use case.
High performance Linux file shares, but SMB support and HDD tier are coming.
Microsoft has been clear about that roadmap.
So instead of managing a big bucket with many shares that all share the same limits, the
same network rules, the same keys and the same bill, now each share is its own small bucket
with its own lock.
Simple.
So when does it make sense to actually use Azure files?
When to use Azure files?
So when does Azure files actually make sense?
Let me walk you through the scenarios.
First up is lift and shift.
You've got an old application that depends on file shares.
Maybe it's a legacy business app.
Maybe it's a custom tool your team built years ago.
Normally moving that to the cloud means rewriting code, changing configurations, rethinking
how data gets accessed.
With Azure files though you don't touch a single line of code.
The app just sees a network drive.
It doesn't care if that drive lives in your office closet or inside a Microsoft data center,
same protocol, same behavior.
That's the whole point.
Another big use case is sharing configuration files, logs or data across multiple virtual
machines.
So you have a cluster of web servers.
They all need the same config.
Instead of copying files to each VM and hoping they stay in sync, you mount one Azure
file share on every server.
Change one file.
Every server sees it instantly.
No more chasing mismatched versions.
Development and testing teams love this too.
You can spin up a file share in minutes, use it for a week, then delete it when you're done.
No hardware to buy, no server to decommission.
For anyone who needs temporary shared storage, this is a huge time saver.
Then there's the hybrid cloud scenario.
Azure file syncs lets you cache files on a local server while keeping Azure files as
the source of truth.
Your on-premises users get local performance for the files they access most.
Meanwhile, the cloud copy stays up to date automatically.
Branch officers love this, remote teams love this.
It gives you the best of both worlds without the headache.
But Azure files isn't the answer for everything.
Don't use it for high performance databases.
If you need database-level speed, go with Azure SQL or manage disks.
Azure files is a file share, not a database engine.
It's optimized for file access patterns, not transactional workloads.
There are different tools for different jobs.
Don't use it where SharePoint or Microsoft Teams already covers the need.
If you're sharing documents that people edit together in real time, SharePoint is the
better fit.
You get version history, co-authoring, and deep integration with the rest of Microsoft 365.
Azure files is for the scenarios where SharePoint doesn't quite work.
And don't use it for applications that need custom file system features like symbolic links,
hard links, or extended attributes.
Azure files handle standard file system behavior just fine, but it doesn't support every edge
case.
Know your requirements before you commit.
Let me give you a real world example.
A construction company has field offices in three cities.
Each office needs access to the same set of blueprints, contracts, and inspection reports.
In the old setup, they'd have a server at headquarters.
And remote workers would connect through a slow VPN.
Opening a blueprint could take minutes.
With Azure files, they create a single share in the cloud.
Every office mounted, blueprints open in seconds.
Contracts are always the latest version.
Know VPN required.
No server to maintain.
It just works.
But performance and security matter too, so let's touch on those.
Performance, security, and cost at a glance.
It starts with performance.
If you need speed, the premium tier runs on SSDs and delivers single millisecond latency.
We're talking up to 102,400 IOPS per share with the provisioned V2 model.
That's serious throughput for demanding workloads.
The standard tier uses regular hard drives.
It's slower but much cheaper.
Perfect for archival storage or general file sharing, where speed isn't critical.
Microsoft recently added metadata caching for SSD shares.
This cuts latency by up to 55% when you're listing directories or browsing folders.
If your workflow involves lots of small files and frequent folder navigation, this makes a
noticeable difference.
Now security.
Azure files has encryption at rest enabled by default.
Every byte you write gets encrypted before it hits the disk.
You don't have to configure anything.
It's just on encryption in transit is also on by default for SMB 3.0 and higher.
Your data stays encrypted while traveling between your computer and the cloud.
Nobody on the network can read it.
Microsoft recommends using identity-based access instead of storage account keys.
That means your user is logging with their normal work credentials.
The same ones they use for email and teams.
No shared keys to manage, no risk of a key leaking.
For network isolation you have options.
Private endpoints give your file share a private IP address inside your own virtual network.
Service endpoints keep traffic on the Microsoft backbone.
Firewall rules let you restrict access to specific IP ranges.
You can layer these however you like and there's Microsoft Defender for storage.
It monitors your file shares for suspicious activity.
If someone uploads malware through the rest API, Defender can catch it.
It's an extra layer of protection for sensitive environments.
Cost wise the premium tier uses provisioned pricing.
You reserve a certain amount of capacity, IOPS and throughput and you pay for what you reserve.
Standard is pay as you go.
You only pay for the storage you actually use.
If your workloads are predictable, Azure files reservations can save you up to 36%.
Commit to one or three years and Microsoft gives you a discount.
No performance impact, just lower bills.
One practical tip.
Keep your compute and storage in the same Azure region.
This region data transfer costs add up fast.
Collocate your VMs and your file shares and you avoid those egress charges entirely.
That's a lot of info.
Let me tie it together.
The big picture, why this matters.
Here's the core idea.
The old storage account model made you manage all that complexity even when all you wanted
was a simple file share.
You needed to understand storage accounts, shared limits, network rules that applied to
everything and billing that lumped everything together.
It was like renting a whole building just to use one room.
The new file shares resource fixes that.
Now you're renting just that room.
One file share, one set of limits, one network configuration, one bill, no extra baggage.
For beginners, this changes everything.
You can start with a single file share in minutes.
No deep Azure knowledge required, created, mounted and you're done.
For IT pros, it's even better.
Granular control over each share.
Better security because there's no all powerful storage account key.
Simpler billing because each share shows up separately in cost reports.
And remember, Azure files isn't just a drive in the sky.
It connects to Azure backup for automated backups.
It works with Azure file sync for hybrid scenarios.
And it integrates with Microsoft Defender for security monitoring.
That's the larger ecosystem at work.
So what should you do with this info?
Azure files gives you a cloud file server without the server hassle.
And the new standalone file shares resource makes it even easier.
No storage accounts, no shared limits, no complex billing.
If you're still running a physical file server, this is your sign to try Azure files.
Start small, create a single share for a test team and see how it feels.
Subscribe on your favorite podcast platform and
share this with someone who manages backups on a Friday afternoon.